Yesterday I found a case that looked like it would be detrimental to the argument my boss wanted to make. Then I read the case deeper and found
that I could make a very clever distinction between what we are
arguing and what that case holds. Basically it is dealing with a
statute of repose (e.g. you must apply for this before Nov. 1 1999)
whereas we're talking about statutes of limitations (e.g. you have one
year to file this. Statutes of limitations under the INA are subject
to equitable tolling, unlike statutes of repose which cannot be
tolled.
Tuesday, June 08, 2004
Victory is Mine
-x-
